{"id":6764,"date":"2016-07-10T15:59:23","date_gmt":"2016-07-10T15:59:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/steelcityscribblings.uk\/wp\/?p=6764"},"modified":"2017-05-01T14:14:33","modified_gmt":"2017-05-01T14:14:33","slug":"6764","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/steelcityscribblings.uk\/wp\/2016\/07\/10\/6764\/","title":{"rendered":"Is this England? Ask Chaucer!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been re-watching <strong>This is England.<\/strong>\u00a0Not the movie, set in 1983, but the Channel 4 mini-series it spawned: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.channel4.com\/programmes\/this-is-england-86\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>This is England 1986<\/strong><\/a> .. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.channel4.com\/programmes\/this-is-england-88\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>1988<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0 .. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.channel4.com\/programmes\/this-is-england-90\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>1990<\/strong><\/a>. They&#8217;re on catch up at All 4 and if you never saw them, find the space in your busy life to fix that. If you <em>did<\/em> \u00a0see them, trust me, they stand a second viewing; now more than ever as Remainer contempt and ire focus on a familiar target: white trash, a species too lowlife to be protected by political correctness.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a reason for that. Advanced capitalism has less need of racism and other divisions than it once had. It is now possible &#8211; indeed, desirable materially as well as ideologically &#8211; to level the playing field for women, and for black, LGBT and some disabled people. The excluded still had to fight, yes, but many\u00a0of their fights were winnable when,\u00a0far\u00a0from posing an existential threat to capitalism, the demanded\u00a0reforms would update and\u00a0give it new vigour. Ditto\u00a0gains by organised labour a generation earlier, including those which in the pull\/push of postwar boom and cold war concession gave\u00a0academically minded working class kids a free pass out of the council estate and into the middle class.<\/p>\n<p>What post-Keynesian\/post USSR capitalism &#8211; <em>aka<\/em>\u00a0 neoliberalism &#8211; can no longer do, however, is offer a meaningful stake to its burgeoning underclass.\u00a0This inability, at the very heart of free market capitalism in a globalised age, has several implications. One is\u00a0that Britain and other western democracies are perilously divided, another that the British Labour Party now teeters on the edge of <a href=\"https:\/\/steelcityscribblings.uk\/wp\/2016\/07\/09\/labours-crisis-is-structural\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>irreversible split<\/strong><\/a>. But for present purposes\u00a0I&#8217;m interested in a third implication: the psychological law under\u00a0which a\u00a0group whose plight we see as\u00a0hopeless will be regarded, perversely but inexorably, with fear and loathing. It&#8217;s the way things work, the way winners manage whatever internal dissonance our indifference to losers provokes. You see it in Israel&#8217;s hardened attitude to displaced Palestinians. And in the way a Wolfgang Sch\u00e4uble &#8211; amnesiac on how Germany owes its prosperity to chessboard moves\u00a0formulated in Washington as cold war dawned on Europe &#8211; peddles the self serving narrative of hard working, thriftily teutonic protestantism bailing out a feckless Southern Europe.<\/p>\n<p>I digress but slightly. Here&#8217;s a comment today, below a lightweight Graun <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2016\/jul\/09\/post-brexit-meltdown#comment-78661169\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>piece on Brexit<\/strong><\/a>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">Do not hand over the UK to the psychopaths, racists, intellectually challanged\u00a0<em>[sic] &#8230;<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>This pro-Remain comment is aimed at the class\u00a0portrayed, without sentimentality but with sympathy and even love, in <strong>This is England.<\/strong> With Chaucerian eye, Shane Meadows places the UK&#8217;s underclass, many of whom voted Leave on June 23, at centre stage. To call that unusual is an understatement. Britain&#8217;s white trash are as underrepresented in serious drama as they are overrepresented on Jeremy Kyle and oversimplified in TV soaps.*<\/p>\n<p>Speaking of literary bigshots, Ian McEwan saw fit the other day to pen an ill informed <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2016\/jul\/09\/country-political-crisis-tories-prime-minister#comment-78564306\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>Guardian piece<\/strong><\/a> on Brexit. Its lazy assumptions drew this from the doughty <strong>zerohoursuni<\/strong>, a chap we steel city scribblers have long viewed with\u00a0guarded approval:<\/p>\n<div class=\"disc-comment__body\">\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">I voted Remain with peg on nose and mindful of Greece&#8217;s merciless shafting last year &#8230; of TTIP &#8230; of the growing role of the EU as political-economic wing of NATO in its eastwardly expansive provocations of Russia. But McEwan &#8211; many of whose novels I rate highly &#8211; has written a one sided piece with two major flaws. First, he targets the &#8216;dupes&#8217; who swallowed Brexit lies to vote Leave but &#8211; as so many of the Remainers do &#8211; shows himself to be duped in an implicit confusion of EU with real internationalism.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">Second, he devotes not one word to the fact &#8211; IMO more serious than Brexit itself &#8211; of the class and national divisions the result has exposed. Misguided or not, the demographics of the Leave vote suggest a howl of rage from those who&#8217;ve most lost out to neoliberalism&#8217;s race to the bottom. It&#8217;s not just McEwan. I know many people &#8211; good people I&#8217;m proud to call my friends &#8211; who live in spacious houses in leafy suburbs, yet deep down believe their enlightened stance on immigration, their cosmopolitan take on the EU, stem from superior intellect and greater humanity &#8211; rather than from leading lives of privilege in which they do not compete over low paid jobs, or scarce and overpriced rented accommodation. I&#8217;m 63 but have never known Britain as divided as it now is. The unravelling of the social contract in the face of globalised free market capitalism is what we should fear. At the side of this, Brexit is small potatoes &#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Quite so, zerohoursuni. Quite so.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Update: <\/strong>a friend has sent a link to this <a href=\"http:\/\/mondediplo.com\/2016\/07\/03brexit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>brilliant piece<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0in Le Monde by Paul Mason &#8230;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h6>* Eastenders offers a huge canvas with near infinite scope for developing character, but this advantage is neutered by the need, greater than ever as attention spans plummet in the digital age, for constant action; a need easily gratified by the relentlessly adversarial dialogue Albert Square dwellers are renowned\u00a0for.<\/h6>\n<h6>I should add that at one level This is England is, as a friend puts it, &#8220;OTT tosh&#8221;. It certainly has its many moments of hyperbole and surreal comedy &#8211; as do Titus Andronicus, Millers Tale, Pickwick, Catch-22, Bonfire of the Vanities and many other rightful claimants to our literary respect. Whether T.i.E is or is not serious drama hinges not on its glorious absurdities but on whether it marks a serious and authentic attempt to get under the skin and into the minds of its protagonists. And on whether or not it treats &#8211; in its many moments of profound gravitas &#8211; themes like incest, rape, self loathing, racism and revenge in a dignified, penetrative, unflinching and above all honest way. On these criteria it passes with flying colours.<\/h6>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been re-watching This is England.\u00a0Not the movie, set in 1983, but the Channel 4 mini-series it spawned: This is England 1986 .. 1988\u00a0 .. 1990. They&#8217;re on catch up at All 4 and if you never saw them, find &#8230; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/steelcityscribblings.uk\/wp\/2016\/07\/10\/6764\/\">Read More &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6764","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics-uk"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/steelcityscribblings.uk\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6764","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/steelcityscribblings.uk\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/steelcityscribblings.uk\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/steelcityscribblings.uk\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/steelcityscribblings.uk\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6764"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/steelcityscribblings.uk\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6764\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/steelcityscribblings.uk\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/steelcityscribblings.uk\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/steelcityscribblings.uk\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}