… in fact only a small proportion are but, as I argued six years ago in one of my increasingly rare non political posts – and little knowing how much extra weight this truth would be called on to shoulder – it is not irrational to fear snakes.
“Not all snakes are venomous” now has added traction as a response to a particularly specious dismissal of fears, voiced by women, of men in general:
Not all men are rapists or murderers.1
The point being that it is not irrational for women to fear men. “Not all snakes are venomous” is of little comfort on snake infested terrain when – through lack of knowledge or low visibility – we can’t know which specimens do, and which do not, fit the bill.
Worse though is thinking we do know, when we don’t, and picking up the wrong snake. Here’s where the analogy best fits since most rapes and most murders are by men known – just not well enough – to their victims.
In recent times another twist has been added. A militant segment of transgenderism is bent on calling out as transphobes or TERFs (transgender exclusionary radical feminists) those of us who say sex is biological and binary. At this battle’s epicentre are women’s sports, and women only spaces like toilets, changing rooms, saunas, prisons and refuges.
Here’s a snippet from a recent FB thread, below a post by Save Women’s Sports:
That was several days ago and Tess Crow has declined to take me up on my invitation. Which does not surprise me given so slender a case for trans-women in cis-women – it’s ridiculous that we even need the latter term – competitive sports.
And access to women’s spaces? I’ve encountered several times – both at first hand and in the exchanges of others – the argument that there is no evidence of transgender women abusing such access. This is false but in any case fails to address the legitimate fears of women in jails shared with such as Karen White. Nor those of Vancouver women fleeing male violence, only to find that women’s refuges must admit transgender women else lose their funding.
In a polite and closely but I say speciously argued open letter to J K Rowling – see this version on Mumsnet – the transgender group Mermaids argues that cis-women are at greater risk from other cis-women than from trans-women. The letter provides no evidence for this, and we’re left presuming such ‘greater risk’ to be proportionally adjusted: otherwise it’s like saying I’m at greater risk from attack by dogs or cows than crocodiles on the lam from London Zoo (true) – making crocs safer than said dogs or cows (false). It does vaguely invoke ‘research’ neither linked nor referenced – in fact not even named – but even if true, and even if sample sizes were large enough to support meaningful generalisation, the claim would not warrant the solution it seeks. Rather, it would speak to a need for dedicated trans-women refuges.
Why? Because “not all snakes are venomous” just doesn’t cut it with those already bitten by the snake that was.
* * *