Women who lift too much

7 May

Meet Laurel, who has opened up a canyon in the world of identity politics.

Says wiki:

[As a man] Hubbard set New Zealand junior records … later surpassed by David Liti. In 2012 Hubbard was appointed Executive Officer for Olympic Weightlifting New Zealand. Subsequently she transitioned to female and became Laurel Hubbard.

At the 2017 Australian International & Australian Open in Melbourne, she … became the first trans woman to win an international weightlifting title for New Zealand

Now meet Rachel McKinnon – Women’s Sprint winner of the UCI Masters World Track Cycling Championship. (No, I don’t know what that means either but McKinnon thinks it a big deal – as do a good many who are less thrilled by this achievement.)

Here’s a conservative-values promoting National Review, with a piece showing that on matters of science, and in this case common sense too, people of vastly different political stripe – the author and me for instance – may speak as one.

Rachel McKinnon Is a Cheat and a Bully

Rachel McKinnon — the so-called defending “world champion” of women’s track cycling — is a man …

… a structure of lies and tyranny [has been] erected around us [which] most cannot opt out of without incurring enormous social cost.1 McKinnon is the perfect example of how this structure works and operates, as well as why we should resist it.

McKinnon lived unambiguously as a man (“Rhys”) until the age of 29. … As an associate professor at the College of Charleston, McKinnon decided to get into sport cycling. (Fair.) He won the 200-meter sprint record for women in the 35–39 range in 2018, and then the UCI Masters World Track Cycling Championship in the Women’s Sprint. (Not fair.)

Full piece here

When I say this columnist and I “speak as one”, I must qualify that. I know nothing of McKinnon beyond ‘her’ cycling as a woman. I would only endorse the ‘cheat’ charge in the general sense that I do not believe ‘men who identify as women’ have any place in women’s sporting events. Nor in women’s loos, changing rooms, prisons, refuges or any other physical spaces designated as female only.

As for that ‘bully’ charge, I again endorse it only in the more general sense that an alarmingly McCarthyesque climate has emerged around this issue. Many of us have been attacked online as TERFs (trans exclusionary radical feminists – not applicable in my case as I don’t call myself any kind of feminist) or transphobes (also n/a, for reasons more easily summarised). Pressures are particularly strong in, but by no means confined to, the British Labour Party and academia,2 where such accusations (a) become their own ‘proof’ …

So the defamation escalates. First you call someone a ‘transphobe’. Then next time you can call them a ‘known transphobe.’ Next, when you’ve called them a known transphobe often enough, they become a  ‘Notorious transphobe’. All without saying a single word, and just because the attackers say it and say it again and again.

Esther Giles, Labour Party

… and (b) make one spurious conflation – that insisting on the biological reality of sex amounts to transphobia – bearing striking commonalities with another – that support for Palestinians in apartheid Israel is anti-semitic.

On FB today, below a Save Women’s Sports post. Tess has gone silent. Should that change I’ll update the above. Update May 10 – TC has chosen NOT to elaborate. Let no ‘man’ say I no-platformed this person.

As a matter of fact I see this sense-addling issue – given intellectual credence, I suspect, on the back of decades of postmodernism half baked3 – as an especially chilling case of a truth more generalisable. A truth explored in my post on the divisive nature of identity politics and, more succinctly, in this cartoon.


  1. “Enormous social cost.” See for instance the Maya Forstater employment law case, and the Vancouver Refuge forced to close when it was denied funding for refusing to admit men who ‘identify as women’ to a place for women fleeing male violence. Both are cited in that post on identity politics, inspired by a Facebook exchange on sexual – as distinct from gender – identity.
  2. I’ll post soon on how academia has also become a theatre in the duplicitous and highly dangerous propaganda war on China.
  3. “Postmodernism half baked” has given specious credence to a quantum leap: from challenges to social exclusion founded in objective reality – notably skin colour, sex, sexual preference, age and physical/mental disability; to one not only subjectively based, but denying the science on sex as binary and biological. And a slap in the face for decades of struggle by feminists to make precisely the distinction, between sex and gender, so important to women’s liberation.

4 Replies to “Women who lift too much

  1. one spurious conflation – that insisting on the biological reality of sex amounts to transphobia – bearing striking commonalities with another – that support for Palestinians in apartheid Israel is anti-semitic.

    So striking that a conspiracy theorist might surmise that they came out of the same propaganda design studio. Designed to split the left.

    • With the added bonus that all the heavy lifting, so to speak, is being carried out on behalf of the Neo-Fuedalists by those who self identify as “progressives” under a so called “left-wing” banner.

      • In fact the title of the piece from which I lifted that passage by Esther Giles is No Platforming and the so-called Left

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *