Calling Russia’s invasion “unprovoked” is proof of media corruption on matters vital to power

8 Aug

Here’s Caitlin Johnstone, writing today. Other than two brief interjections by me, on a point I’ve argued more than once, the words following this introduction are all hers.

Another point, one I’ve been making since well before the West’s war on Russia in Ukraine, is that our quality media gain credibility – and the appearance of a courageous independence which, alas, fools most of us – through their willingness to embarrass power on matters which may be important but are not vital to it. Without assuming conscious mendacity – nor ruling it out – this bank of credibility is then freely drawn upon on matters which are.

Never more zealously than in demonising states and leaders challenging western supremacy.

The Illusory Truth Effect And The “Unprovoked” Invasion Of Ukraine

Arguably the single most egregious display of war propaganda in the 21st century occurred last year, when the entire western political/media class began uniformly bleating the word “unprovoked” in reference to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

On February 23 of last year, the day before the invasion began, the New York Times editorial board wrote that “an unprovoked invasion of a sovereign European state is an unprovoked declaration of war on a scale, on a continent and in a century when it was thought to be no longer possible.”

After the war began, the Biden White House released a statement titled “Remarks by President Biden on Russia’s Unprovoked and Unjustified Attack on Ukraine.” Secretary of State Antony Blinken shared Biden’s statement on Twitter with the comment “Russia’s premeditated, unprovoked, and unjustified attack on Ukraine blatantly disregards the lives of innocent men, women, and children, Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and international law.”

In early March of last year, the New York Times editorial board wrote that western sanctions against Russia in retaliation for the invasion “have demonstrated that there are consequences for unprovoked wars of aggression.”

In April of last year the New York Times editorial board again repeated this slogan, writing that Putin had “ordered an unprovoked war to satisfy his ambitions of empire and the destruction of a neighboring nation.”

In May of last year the New York Times editorial board reiterated that “Ukraine deserves support against Russia’s unprovoked aggression.”

According to analyst Jeffrey Sachs, the New York Times used the word unprovoked “no fewer than 26 times, in five editorials, 14 opinion columns by NYT writers, and seven guest op-eds.” 

But it wasn’t just the Paper of Record singing from the same hymnal as the US government on Ukraine. The Guardian editorial board wrote that “Mr Putin’s unprovoked war against a smaller, democratic neighbour has resulted in 1.7 million people fleeing their homes.” The LA Times editorial board wrote that the “most conspicuous victims of Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine are the people who will lose their lives in defending their country against a brutal (and nuclear-armed) neighbor.” The Chicago Tribune editorial board made reference to “Putin’s audacious, unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.” The Financial Times editorial board made reference to “Putin’s unprovoked assault on Russia’s neighbour.” The Washington Post editorial board made reference to “Moscow’s disastrous, unprovoked invasion” and to “Russia’s unprovoked invasion” in two separate pieces.

Everywhere you looked, that word was being uncritically regurgitated by the western press. CNN saying “Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine has devastated the country, killing hundreds of civilians, sparking a humanitarian disaster and resulting in a wave of sanctions from the West.” Timbabbling about “Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24.” The New Yorker saying “Vladimir Putin ordered Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.” NBC News saying “Russia’s unprovoked attack on Ukraine began Thursday, after weeks of buildup.” CNBC talking about “Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.”

This is just me citing a few of the basically limitless examples I can point to of this war sloganeering throughout the mass media. The western press uphold themselves as impartial arbiters of truth, purporting to be superior to the state media propagandists of nations like Russia and China, and claiming a legitimacy that ordinary people using social media don’t have. And yet here they are uncritically parroting the talking points of the US government and taking sides against Russia.

The western media claim to report the facts, but the way they’ve fallen in line behind the “unprovoked” narrative reveals that their actual job is to frame world events in a way that serves the information interests of their government. Which would be bad enough if that narrative was just a biased framing of a contentious issue, and not the bald-faced lie that it actually is.

During an interview last year with the Useful Idiots podcast, Noam Chomsky argued that the reason we keep hearing the western press using the word “unprovoked” in reference to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is because it absolutely was provoked, and they know it.

“Right now if you’re a respectable writer and you want to write in the main journals, you talk about the Russian invasion of Ukraine, you have to call it ‘the unprovoked Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Chomsky said. “It’s a very interesting phrase; it was never used before. You look back, you look at Iraq, which was totally unprovoked, nobody ever called it ‘the unprovoked invasion of Iraq.’ In fact I don’t know if the term was ever used — if it was it was very marginal. Now you look it up on Google, and hundreds of thousands of hits. Every article that comes out has to talk about the unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.

“Why? Because they know perfectly well it was provoked, That doesn’t justify it …

No. What justifies it is the scale of the threat to Russia …

… posed by what is the most aggressive power on the planet by an incontestable and easily quantifiable margin …

… the USA, aided by Europe, the Antipodes, Canada and elsewhere, invades with impunity … reneges on or tears up every treaty no longer deemed to further its interests … brags of its lies, theft and treachery … insists on its right as ‘the Exceptionalist Nation’ to flout and replace international law with a ‘rules based order’ as self-serving as it is arbitrarily imposed …  rings the planet with 800 military bases, out-spends on weaponry the next ten spenders put together, has been at war for almost its entire history and has slain millions – by bombs, invasions, murderous ‘sanctions’ and terror unleashed – in this century alone. Mostly in far off lands.

In what moral universe can anything remotely similar be said of Russia or China?

steel city scribblings: a canary sings …

… and Russia’s exhaustion, after decades of diplomatic effort, of all possibilities for securing its legitimate needs via peaceful processes.

… but it was massively provoked.”

Indeed, you can disagree with Russia’s invasion or believe that Putin overreacted to the situation …

I don’t, and have yet to hear those who concede US aggression but also blame the Kremlin set out credible alternative paths the latter might have taken. (For an example of that viewpoint – offered by several sources I respect but with whom I on this matter part company – see my January post, Ukraine Take 2 – Stephen Gowans.)

… but what you can’t do is legitimately claim that the invasion was unprovoked. It’s just a welldocumented fact that the US and its allies provoked this war in a whole host of ways, from NATO expansion to backing regime change in Kyiv to playing along with aggressions against Donbass separatists to pouring weapons into Ukraine. There’s also an abundance of evidence that the US and its allies sabotaged a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine in the early weeks of the war in order to keep this conflict going as long as possible to hurt Russian interests.

We know that western actions provoked the war in Ukraine because many western foreign policy experts spent years warning that western actions would provoke a war in Ukraine. There’s footage of John Mearsheimer back in 2015 urgently warning that “the west is leading Ukraine down the primrose path, and the end result is that Ukraine is going to get wrecked.” And that’s exactly how it played out.

The reason foreign policy “realists” like Mearsheimer were able to correctly predict the war in Ukraine is because they held at the forefront of their analysis the fact that great powers will never accept threats from other great powers on their borders. This is a key point to understanding the major conflicts of the 2020s, not just between the US and Russia but between the US and China as well — and the US is the one amassing the threats on the borders of its enemies in both instances.

“The thesis of the war being unprovoked is very strategic,” foreign policy analyst Max Abrams recently tweeted in response to my commentary on this subject. “It whitewashes the role of NATO expansion, meddling in the Maidan uprisings and siding with far right extremists in the civil war. Not only does it exonerate America but it helps vilify Russia and sell the war as wholly good.”

The reason the mass media have been bleating the word “unprovoked” in unison with regard to this war is because the mass media are propaganda organs of the US empire. Their repetition of this war propaganda slogan exploits a glitch in human cognition known as the illusory truth effect, which makes it difficult for our minds to tell the difference between the experience of hearing something many times and the experience of hearing something that’s true. Just repeatedly inserting the word “unprovoked” into Ukraine war commentary across the board causes people to assume it must have been launched without provocation, because the illusory truth effect can circumvent reason and logic to insert a narrative into the collective consciousness of our civilization.

The fact that all mass media outlets began doing this in unison, against all journalistic training and ethics, shows you just how united the mass media are in service of the US empire. When the need to push a narrative is particularly urgent, the facade of journalistic impartiality and independence drops away, and we see the true face of the most sophisticated propaganda machine that has ever existed.

* * *

One Reply to “Calling Russia’s invasion “unprovoked” is proof of media corruption on matters vital to power”

  1. Perusing the output of the oligarch’s fifth column that passes for the fourth estate from the Autumn of 2021 through to late February 2022 the conventional ‘wisdom’ of the message was that any likely crossing of the border by RF forces would take place well to the north from Belarus as a result of the constantly screaming headlines and op-eds about the number of Russian troops in Belarus.

    Yet the bulk of the best of Ukraine’s forces were concentrated in the south facing the breakaway Donbass Republics rather than preparing to face a potential threat coming from the north.

    If were not for those pesky OSCE reports recording the massive increase in the shelling of civilians in the Donbass from those Ukrainian Forces massed on the Donbass contact line – and the inevitable increase in the death rates of civilians who obviously don’t count because they are Russian (including the children) – there’s every likelihood that The Official Narrative would have informed us, in all seriousness, that the last week in February and first week in March was the Ukrainian Works Weeks and all these troops, equipment and munitions were simply gathered at a transit point for their annual Summer Camp at the side of the Black Sea.

    A typical example of these double standards was provided by MoA on Monday of this week – which, being a short piece is worth posting in full:

    The BBC reported on August 22, 2022:

    Taiwan: Two US warships sail through strait

    Two US warships are passing through the Taiwan Strait, the US Navy has announced.

    Washington says its two guided-missile cruisers – the USS Antietam and the USS Chancellorsville – are demonstrating freedom of navigation through international waters.

    Beijing views such actions as provocative and maintains that the island of Taiwan is an integral part of Chinese territory.

    On Sunday, its military said it was monitoring the two vessels’ progress, maintaining a high alert, and was ready to defeat any provocation, Reuters news agency reports.

    The US Navy said in a statement that the transit through the Taiwan Strait demonstrated the “United States’ commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific”.

    The WSJ on August 6, 2023:

    Russia and China Sent Large Naval Patrol Near Alaska

    A combined Russian and Chinese naval force patrolled near the coast of Alaska last week in what U.S. experts said appeared to be the largest such flotilla to approach American shores.

    Eleven Russian and Chinese ships steamed close to the Aleutian Islands, according to U.S. officials. The ships, which never entered U.S. territorial waters and have since left, were shadowed by four U.S. destroyers and P-8 Poseidon aircraft.

    “It is a historical first,” said Brent Sadler, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation and a retired Navy captain. “Given the context of the war in Ukraine and tensions around Taiwan, this move is highly provocative.”

    Sen. Dan Sullivan of Alaska, a Republican member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the patrol was a reminder that the U.S. has entered “a new era of authoritarian aggression” and applauded the robust U.S. response.”

    The global majority non Western media have missed a good headline here:

    “They don’t like it up ’em Mr Putin!”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *