On the death of a Queen

8 Sep

Outside Buckingham Palace yesterday

I’ve never been one for claiming psychic powers but try this for size. Early afternoon yesterday the thought occurred, courtesy one of those random associative chains the mind’s humdrum chatter churns out 24/7, that Prince Philip is dead. Well, I told myself, it can’t be long before his widow – on the throne more years than I, though seventy this month, have been drawing breath – follows suit.

When Jackie got home a few hours later with the news that the lady had done precisely that, I briefly entertained the idea I may be paranormally gifted. Then I recalled all those other days – infrequent, yes, but they do stack up over a decade or two – when I’d had thoughts of a similar nature: thoughts not subsequently elevated to prophetic status in the world of time and space; cause and effect.

Regardless, was she a Good Person? Don’t know, don’t much care. What I do know is this:

  • In an illusion wrapped in a chimera – that of a constitutional monarch within a genuine democracy – she had the power to dismiss her government, with her armed forces solemnly oathed to support her in the event of any dispute on the matter. Of course this power is little used, though we should note the 1976 dismissal of Gough Whitlam’s Labour Government in Australia. The British ruling class has a plethora of seemingly arcane powers – cards for a rainy day, either unknown to the public else dismissed as harmless but colourful pageant – but none trump that ace of spades, the British Crown.
  • This leads to a wider point. It matters not one whit whether and to what degree Elizabeth II was onboard with Gough Whitlam’s ouster. We needn’t suppose the powers invested in her to be a personal thing. While there’s ample evidence of their use to veto legislation on matters affecting her family, that is a damning but not pivotal issue. More important is that these powers exist to maintain class rule under threat. Given that an anonymous general declared, following Jeremy Corbyn’s election as Leader of Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition, that the armed forces might stage a coup in the event of his becoming prime minister, we again do well to remind ourselves to whom those forces pledge fealty. And let me say it again: for purposes of class rule it matters not whether that fealty is to a real person or a figurehead – though in truth both apply.
  • Even as a real person, with that symbolic role set aside, let’s not forget how stinking rich and by that fact powerful Britain’s senior royals, like the man finally promoted to the top job, truly are. So toxic a mix of opulence and powers only part-hidden from view is not to be underestimated.

Naturally I am a republican, as any socialist must be. But this is not to say class rule depends on a royal family. Other equally rapacious powers – France and the USA spring instantly to mind – manage perfectly well to loot the planet as republics. But I won’t for a moment forget, as the world’s media and Britain’s in particular stage a hagiographic orgy over the death of one of the seven billion souls who inhabit this scorching earth, that as far as British class rule is concerned, the monarchy will continue to play a highly significant role.

The Queen is dead – short live the King!

* * *

2 Replies to “On the death of a Queen

  1. Whilst ever the political opposition remains “The Loyal Opposition” – as in loyal to a Feudal monarchy and the titular head of that structure and its processes – there cannot and never will be any kind of healthy democracy anywhere on these islands.

    Nothing has changed meaningfully and fundamentally in the last thousand years in terms of the undemocratic Feudal powers and influence which severely determine the limits and curtail the use of any power outside that Feudal structure. A structure which reaches right down to local level with its Lord Lieutenant’s and deputy Lord Lieutenant’s along with associated patronage.

    A patronage epitomised in the still operative principle of U and non-U, popularised over half a century ago by the Mitford’s, which produces an infantile culture which very effectively lobotomises much of the populace into unthinking forelock tugging and cap doffing drones unable and unwilling to accept any kind of functioning and workable democracy.

    From the philanderer WEF stooge Charles to his Epstein customer brother there is no one within this structure fit to have the power and privilege they enjoy at everyone else’s expense. Those who seriously believe that being in any way reasonable will ever induce the Feudal British Class to relinquish any of its powers are delusional and represent a major barrier to both effective progress and grown up thinking.

    The French had the right idea.

    • The French had the right idea.

      Yes and no, Dave. Like the English 150 years earlier, they made an incumbent monarch shorter by a head. But just as England restored its monarchy, so was Bonaparte made emperor, thereby infuriating the magnificently spirited Beethoven to the point where he had to be physically restrained from hurling the score for his third symphony – hitherto dedicated to the man – on the fire!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *