Palestine: Labour’s war on NHS workers

1 Dec

Kernow Damo two days ago:

If the data showed a runaway surge of incidents in the NHS requiring emergency intervention, the government would be shouting the numbers from the rooftops, wouldn’t they? They’d be on every broadcast outlet waving spreadsheets and telling us this is why they need to crack down. But what we actually see is something completely different; the government making hysterical claims about anti-semitism flourishing and out of control, without any evidence to support that, while ignoring every documented incident of Islamophobic or anti-Arab racism in the same period.
So you realize the policy isn’t designed to solve a problem in the NHS. It’s designed to suppress a narrative the government cannot control. And the moment you bring Gaza into the frame, everything snaps into place because British health workers have been going to Gaza, haven’t they? They’ve been working in those hospitals. They’ve seen the injuries, the starvation, the amputations without anaesthetic, the systematic targeting of medical infrastructure. They’ve come home and told the truth on camera. And that truth makes the government’s position untenable. It makes the arms sales indefensible. It makes the political alliance with Israel impossible to justify in public. So when Streeting orders NHS staff not to wear scrubs at protests, when pro-Israel groups dox doctors and nurses, when managers suspend Palestinian nurses for wearing watermelon socks … you’re not looking at coincidence here. You’re looking at a coordinated incentive structure where the state and its ideological allies all want the same outcome – silence.

As a man who get more lucid with anger, Kernow, for the next seventeen minutes the floor is yours:

* * *

3 Replies to “Palestine: Labour’s war on NHS workers

  1. Meanwhile, Chris Williamson, remember him?, relates that the UK Government sent a top KC to Jersey last week in the trial of anti-Genocide protestor and activist Natalie Strecker,
    to tell the jury they should ignore International Law:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3M4dPQxLkD8

    Bare bones of the story here:

    https://www.thecanary.co/skwawkbox/2025/11/30/anti-genocide-activist/

    However, this seems to be merely the tip of the iceberg in terms of what is likely to be coming.

    Over at the strategic culture site*…….

    https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/12/01/what-does-eu-democracy-shield-mean/

    …..Erik Okin provides a short piece of the new EU “Democracy Shield”:

    “According to the official statement, the project aims to strengthen “democratic resilience,” establish early-warning systems against disinformation and foreign interference, support the media and civil society, ensure election security, and create comprehensive crisis protocols……

    …..The European Democracy Shield has three main action plans:
    • the protection of “the integrity of the information space,”
    • the strengthening of “institutions, free and fair elections, and a free and independent media,”
    • and the enhancement of “societal resilience and citizen participation.”

    At the heart of the project lies the phrase “defending democracy,” which is critical. This language is used to protect the EU’s geopolitical interests, to portray “rival actors”—primarily Russia—as adversaries, and to legitimize the EU’s foreign-policy tools. How so?

    Because the project documents make clear that the system focuses directly on “foreign disinformation and interference.” Its implementation entails activating crisis protocols, early-warning centers, and international coordination mechanisms. Any alleged “interference” in EU policies can thus easily be used to criminalize left/socialist movements or anti-EU circles.

    In essence, although the official documents emphasize concepts such as “democracy,” “civic participation,” and “free citizens,” the EU is building a new security narrative through the enemies it points to—reshaping domestic politics through a security-based logic.”

    Given that the UK is a leading participant in the so called ‘Coalition of the willing’ champing at the bit to start a 21st century reenactment of the Crimean War and show those Johnny foreigner Russians whose boss, you can safely bet your pension that the Crash Test Dummy currently occupying No. 10 Downing Street will have his paymasters own version up and running in some form or other.

    Because all wars start on the Home Front to propagandise the populace into compliance and to portray anyone who deviates from The Official Narrative as seditious, treasonous fifth columnists.

    *I’ve been having problems accessing the Strategic Culture site for the past couple of months on my normal browser, and it is hit-and-miss on TOR. If anyone experiences similar problems, I can supply a PDF copy on request.

  2. Looks like education is also a battleground in this context:

    https://www.thecanary.co/opinion/2025/12/01/uk-schools-censor-palestine/

    “At a meeting about the school and federation management’s allegedly anti-racist practice and curriculum, Palestine solidarity was again shut down and a white Israeli mum was allowed to shout over people, saying she felt “unsafe” as a “Jew and Israeli”. When a mixed race mum shared that she felt the lack of solidarity with Palestine was also racist, the conversation was then shut down and she was told off, despite never raising her voice and actually trembling.”

    At the present rate, these buggers will be stopping our pensions for not showing fealty to Zionism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *